Select Page
,
Phone Hacking Scandal

In a recent article published by The Times, the involvement of Graham Johnson, a former Sunday Mirror journalist and convicted phone hacker, in aiding Prince Harry’s legal battles against the media has come to light. Johnson, self-proclaimed as a “professional liar,” confessed to assisting Prince Harry’s lawyers by gathering evidence of alleged unlawful activities. This revelation has shed light on the extent of the hacking scandal and the deceptive tactics employed within the media industry.

Graham Johnson’s Implication and Credibility Issues:

Graham Johnson, a former investigations editor for the Sunday Mirror, has admitted to his involvement in phone hacking and was subsequently convicted in 2014. Despite his checkered past, Johnson claims to have turned a new leaf, now exposing “organised crime” within the media. However, his credibility comes into question due to his self-confessed status as a “professional liar.” This raises concerns about the reliability of the evidence he gathered and his potential motivations.

The article also highlights Johnson’s collaboration with a private

investigator, where Johnson agreed to pay for 2 days work per month for providing evidence for the legal team. Any other payments related to a book were separated, and a legal dispute emerged between the two parties, which was settled out of court. Johnson ultimately lost this case for committing perjury in his evidence. However, a rift between the two has emerged, with serious allegations being made on social media regarding the conduct of Prince Harry’s legal team and researchers. These allegations include exaggeration, embellishment, doctored evidence, and bribery.

Furthermore, Johnson’s statement that he is unaware of any ongoing criminal investigation or inquiry by the Law Society casts doubt on his knowledge of the situation and raises questions about his credibility. Considering Johnson’s history of deception, it is crucial for the court and the public to scrutinize his claims and evidence carefully.

Conclusion:

The revelations brought forth by the article in The Times expose the deep-rooted issue of hacking and deception within the media industry. While specific involvement of other parties remains unclear, it is essential for any involved investigative agencies to thoroughly investigate any potential connection and ensure adherence to ethical practices. As for Graham Johnson, his admission of hacking and self-identification as a “professional liar” severely impacts his credibility. The court must carefully scrutinize the evidence he presents, particularly considering his history of dishonesty. Ultimately, this case underscores the importance of ethical conduct, transparency, and integrity within the field of investigative journalism and private investigation agencies.